My Blogstuff

Jump to Info & Navigation

axinomancy:

The Conservative Bible Project

The eager young men at Conservapedia are p.o.’d that the Bible might be seen as too liberal. So they’ve come up with the Wiki-style Conservative Bible Project, to make sure the Lord doesn’t go all wobbly on us. Excerpt: As of 2009, there is no fully conservative translation of the Bible which satisfies the following ten guidelines: Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, “gender inclusive” language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level[2] Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms as they develop;[3] defective translations use the word “comrade” three times as often as “volunteer”; similarly, updating words which have a change in meaning, such as “word”, “peace”, and “miracle” Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction by using modern terms for it, such as “gamble” rather than “cast lots”;[4] using modern political terms, such as “register” rather than “enroll” for the census Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil. Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities

axinomancy:

The Conservative Bible Project

The eager young men at Conservapedia are p.o.’d that the Bible might be seen as too liberal. So they’ve come up with the Wiki-style Conservative Bible Project, to make sure the Lord doesn’t go all wobbly on us. Excerpt:

As of 2009, there is no fully conservative translation of the Bible which satisfies the following ten guidelines:

Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias

Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, “gender inclusive” language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity

Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level[2]

Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms as they develop;[3] defective translations use the word “comrade” three times as often as “volunteer”; similarly, updating words which have a change in meaning, such as “word”, “peace”, and “miracle”

Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction by using modern terms for it, such as “gamble” rather than “cast lots”;[4] using modern political terms, such as “register” rather than “enroll” for the census

Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.

Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning

Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story

Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels

Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus

Notes

  1. timeasmymeasure reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  2. davesimeone reblogged this from zuppadivetro
  3. banalitycheck reblogged this from robot-heart-politics and added:
    danielholter:axinomancy:
  4. zetterstrom reblogged this from emmanuelnegro
  5. zuppadivetro reblogged this from emmanuelnegro
  6. jazzinbooks reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  7. craighacker reblogged this from apoplecticskeptic and added:
    Not Thats My Kinda Jesus!! Oh SHIT! Is That A Winchester?!
  8. ragtimemouse reblogged this from atheistramblings and added:
    Oh. My. Goodness. “…There is no fully conservative translation of the Bible…”. Really? There isn’t? The Bible isn’t...
  9. danplaysguitar reblogged this from atheistramblings and added:
    Just a small issue, not that important: Mark and John had been dead for 70 odd years before the bible was written...
  10. sunsmudge reblogged this from apoplecticskeptic
  11. dustydeath reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  12. clapsandpraises reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  13. drinkthe-koolaid reblogged this from atheistramblings
  14. emmanuelnegro reblogged this from atheistramblings
  15. atheistramblings reblogged this from apoplecticskeptic
  16. robot-heart-politics reblogged this from apoplecticskeptic and added:
    The Conservative Bible Project...The eager young men at Conservapedia are p.o.’d that the...