Audit: U.S. can’t account for $8.7 billion of Iraq’s money
(Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Defense was unable to account properly for $8.7 billion of Iraqi oil and gas money meant for humanitarian needs and reconstruction after the 2003 invasion, according to an audit released on Tuesday [July 27, 2010].
The figure is nearly 96 percent of the $9.1 billion funneled to the Pentagon from the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), said the audit report from the U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR).
The report described lax management of some of the billions of dollars designated for rebuilding war-shattered Iraq, where residents routinely complain about lack of electricity and other basic services more than seven years after the invasion.
The DFI was established by the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S.-run body that took charge of Iraq following the invasion.
(Source: paxamericana)
The other day I stumbled across AthensTalks, a community discussion board affiliated with our local paper the Athens Banner Herald. I quickly became disturbed. I couldn’t understand how an an organization could in good conscience allow racist, hate-filled speech to pollute its website. I’m talking in particular about this thread calling for the killing of all Muslims in the world, written by Athens Talk user Naildriver:
Islam IS the Enemy; and Why the USA Should Fight Islam
1. Islam would overthrow the Constitution. Upon that alone, our representitives have betrayed its citizens for not upholding their sworn alligence in taking office.
2. Islam is wrong for all mankind on ethical grounds, and is untrue in its claims. The ‘example’ of its prophet Mohammed is the opposite of that of Christian belief and, if exercised, as often seen in child molestation, polygamy and other acts, is would be contrary to the laws of the USA.
3. Islam would deny freedoms, particularly to women, and incite the murder of gays polythiests and non- believers. It is also openly bigoted toward Jews and Christians; and, none of those directives can be changed or abridged within Islam.
4. Islam is a system of intimidation and violence; and, its presence in the USA requires that American citizens must suffer a loss of freedom to protect against Islam’s perpetual warfare.
This post, besides running contrary to the terms and conditions set by the editor of this community discussion board, is absolutely ridiculous. What’s more, here you have a forum where potential lunatics can post whatever they please without any sort of editorial review. I appreciate that the same terms and conditions explicitly state that no content expressed on the website represents the opinions of the site’s editors nor of the Athens Banner Herald newspaper. However, the board’s editors clearly have a thread of conscience: just before users leave comments, they are advised to basically “keep it clean” — no inflammatory remarks etc. The fact that hate-filled posts like the one above are tolerated by the site’s editors demonstrates at least a passive acceptance of the author’s sentiment.
Anyhow, I responded in the comments:
How is this hate speech allowed to be published on this forum? The same forum where “racist, hate-filled, harassing or libelous comments will not be tolerated.” Posts like this demonstrate how fervently religious our American establishment really is, thus making us not so different from other theocratic states like Israel and Saudi Arabia.
There is far more violence in the Bible than in the Koran, and in human history far more violence has been committed in the name of Christianity than in the name of Islam.
And if you take that cartoon above and swap places between the Koran and any one of the other trampled books, the cartoon would still hold some truth: certain aspects of US law, the Bible, the Constitution, and individuals’ moral codes are constantly infringing upon one other. It’s all about finding the right balance to achieve the most social justice.
Blanket statements such as “all Muslims consider us enemies” only serve to reinforce views of intolerance, thus increasing the risk of becoming a victim of extremist behavior.
As expected, this didn’t go down very well with Naildriver, who replied in the comments with this idiocy (slightly edited for spelling and grammar):
ALL Muslims belong to a religion (if they accept the 5 pillars) that has a major portion of their texts — known to the clerics and mullahs — promoting intimidation and terrorism to achieve the religon’s particular ends. Those portions are in the Koran and hadiths and may be regarded as “significant portions” since Muslims throughout their history have regarded these texts highly during their expansion.
ALL Muslims bear some responsibility; just as a driver for a bank robber bears some responsibility for that crime. We in America do not accept ignorance of the law as an excuse. Those too young or challenged should be re-educated. It’s all about being an enabler.
ALL Muslims might be held responsible to some extent for the crimes of 9/11 since “belonging” suggests approval. The USA government upon such reasoning could say with assurance, Islam is a “dive” for these people who call themselves Muslim, and Islam should then be smashed. It wouldn’t be unfair to call Islam an enemy.
In other comments Naildriver went on to say things like:
This guy is just too far gone. I don’t know how anyone could possibly persuade someone like Naildriver to rethink his position. But I invite anyone reading this blog to go and join the “discussion” on Athens Talk and give it a try.
Educate the ignorant. Inspire the apathetic.
I would have rather this story been about how the passengers uncomfortable with flying with Muslims were kindly allowed to disembark the plane and catch the next Muslim-free flight. But, alas…
Two Muslim men were removed from a plane headed to North Carolina because passengers were uncomfortable, the Council on American-Islamic Relations said.
The incident occurred Friday on a flight from Tennessee to North Carolina.
Masudur Rahman and Mohamed Zaghloul were wearing the traditional Muslim attire, CNN affiliate WCNC reported.
They were headed to North Carolina for a conference on prejudice against Muslims.
(Source: thepolitics)
A typical day in Damascus at a time when Syria is apparently gripped by chaotic bloody turmoil and descending quickly into sectarian civil war… or something.
What is going on in Syria?
Some have asked me what it’s like to be witnessing history — I’d say so far we haven’t exactly witnessed history, but just a lot of men driving around their cars honking horns and waving photos of the president. This is to say, the pro-government movement is a lot more vocal in Damascus, and as a result the security situation there is as stable as always. Same in Aleppo. The vast majority of Syrians — 98% by some estimates, if we believe only 400,000 or so have participated in protests — do not want to face the unknown, the uncertainty, the potential chaos that an overthrow of the government might entail.
One thing to me is clear: there is not yet a strong, uniform, nationwide movement striving for the downfall of the Assad government. Most of the anger and frustration expressed by normal Syrians is because of economic hardship, not because they are supercharged over the need for democracy, etc. The violence in Daraa was an isolated incident, but was so severe that it sparked anger not only there but in a number of Syrian cities. Syrians only have to look to neighboring Lebanon and Iraq to see what sectarian conflict can bring about — civil war — and no Syrian wants civil war. They don’t want to see their country destroyed.
In Syria political dissent is so quickly dispersed, so ruthlessly dealt with, that it’s close to impossible for an opposition political movement to take hold. It’s the specter of an opposition movement that would put ordinary folks at risk. Many Syrians might very well be frustrated with the relative slowness of political and economic reforms, but what they don’t want is civil war. Over the last few years Syrians have seen an influx of ATMs, coffee shops, shopping malls, and other entrapments of a modern economy. While there are not many wealthy people here, most everyone with a job gets by just fine with what they earn.
The CNN effect
There are problems in some parts of the country, however the manner in which these problems are being reported paints a misleading picture. Syria is a complicated story that can’t be reduced to a few sensational headlines. Clearly it’s not okay when the president sends tanks and snipers to mow down and besiege his own people. But the entire country is not on fire. And the two largest cities, Damascus and Aleppo, have remained mostly calm.
Many news reports do indeed look scary. But one must consume these reports in context:
Accidental refugees
Last week we found ourselves stuck in Lebanon. In short, the immigration office in Damascus gave us incorrect information about visas, and when we tried to return in Syria after a lovely week-long vacation with friends, I, as an American, was not allowed to purchase a new entry visa at the land border. Jennifer, as a Spaniard, was allowed to buy a visa and continue into Syria, but we did not want to separate from each other. So we returned to Beirut, got a hotel room, and applied for visas from the Syrian embassy here in town.
It’s very different and quite strange now to be looking on as an outsider. Llke everyone, we’ve been glued to the TV, internet and social networks, soaking in as much information as possible in order to get the best feel of current events we can. The people I trust most about what’s going on, our friends living in Damascus, real people with real lives and a real understanding of the situation, in addition to the Syrian embassy employees here in Beirut, Lebanon, are all telling us that at this point the living conditions in Damascus remain perfectly fine.
And yet, there’s great pressure on us to not go back to Syria, pressure from people who are outside of the country, who don’t understand the situation fully, who don’t know the language, who don’t have our experience of living in Damascus and traveling across Syria and other Middle Eastern countries. But what can we do? These are people who care dearly for us, our families and closest friends, and we don’t want to induce heart attacks in anyone before their times. So we’ve decided to abandon our Arabic studies and leave Syria and the Middle East.
Why this sucks
Besides not being able to properly say goodbye to all our friends, leaving Syria prematurely is extremely frustrating because we haven’t had sufficient time to achieve our language goals. There are plenty of decent learning-Arabic books on the market, but they are written specifically for English speakers learning Arabic. Thus all the grammatical rules and terminologies are explained in English.
This is a problem because so far we have learned all of our Arabic in Arabic. Arabic grammar is very different from English; experts say a major inhibitor to people learning Arabic is trying to translate grammatical concepts into your own language, trying to understand things like “active participle” and “verbal noun” in Arabic the same way we understand them in English. Going from this point forward learning Arabic in English will be a great challenge for us, not as good a learning method, and potentially detrimental. We’ll have to try to come back in the future and complete Levels 5 through 8.
This post is a compendium of emails sent to friends and family over the last few weeks, plus some of my latest thoughts from the couch here in our hotel room in Beirut.
I need another coffee and some water. And a manaeesh.
I wrote yesterday about the uncertainty Jennifer and I were to face at the Syrian border with Lebanon, because both of our multi-entry visas were expired and we intended to buy new ones at the border. We had been given every assurance from the Immigration Office in Damascus that our situation would not be problematic, that we could simply purchase new single-entry visas at the border and continue on our way from Beirut to Damascus. Not so, it turns out.
In what can only be described as typical experience, not one Syrian official knows what he’s talking about. Or rather, he’s quite sure of what he’s talking about, but ask any other Syrian official the same question and you’ll receive an equally sure, yet totally different answer. Here’s what happened…
At the Syrian border, the muwazzaf (employee or clerk) refused to sell me a visa. After we explained to him what had been previously explained to us, he walked my passport over to his mudeer (manager), who also refused to sell me the visa but suggested to ask the ra’ees al-hudud (president of the border) for a third opinion. We explained the situation to this third man, the highest ranking official at the border, but he also refused. I implored him to call the mudeer of the Immigration Office, which he did — or at least, he picked up his phone, dialed some numbers, talked to somebody — before refusing me again, relaying the Immigration mudeer’s message that nobody in his office would have told us what we claim to have been told. In actual fact, Americans in my situation can only buy entry visas at the Syrian Embassy in Beirut.
So that was that. We got back into the car and had our taxi driver take us directly back to Beirut. Found a hotel in Hamra near the Syrian Embassy and this morning we both applied for new entry visas. The process can take anywhere from 10 to 25 days.
Wish us luck.
Republicans’ hate of women’s health, visualized (from GOOD.is):
The pie chart above depicts all the services Planned Parenthood centers around the country provided in 2009. As you can clearly see, only three percent of those services were abortions, while the majority of the other 97 percent were STD tests, contraception provisions, and cancer screenings. In other words, relative to its other services, Planned Parenthood does almost no abortions at all. And of the abortions it does provide, not a single one is paid for with federal funds. Read more
[Meanwhile,] “Pro-life” Republicans are targeting Title X funding, which provides contraception and sexual health advice to millions of needy Americans, and more specifically Planned Parenthood, whose contraception and sexual health services (but not abortion services) are partially supported by Title X. In 2009, Planned Parenthood performed a total of 332,278 abortions (pdf), a number that congressional Republicans apparently find intolerable. According to Guttmacher, however, if the government were to cut all Title X funding, we could expect 406,000 more abortions every year. Read more
Can someone explain to me what small government has to do with women’s health care? How have the mainstream GOP shifted focus from fiscal responsibility to being the morality police? If the GOP was actually so concerned about reckless government spending, why did it allow the previous administration to launch into the two longest foreign wars the USA has ever fought?
Good observation from Mr. Cole:
On Friday, the US Congress endeavored to decide whether American democracy has irretrievably broken down because the representatives of the Billionaires refused to compromise with the representatives of the People (“cutting spending” while “cutting taxes” means “shifting the cost of running society to the middle class from the filthy rich”). The answer was that it had not, as long as the representatives of the People showed sufficient deference to the Billionaires, shuffling, keeping their eyes down, and obediently emptying their pockets. The middle class, successfully distracted by racial and religious hatreds and by attempts to impose patriarchal fundamentalism, was wreathed in vapid smiles as the billionaires sent movers to their homes to pick up the belongings they had just fleeced from them via their enforcers, the tea baggers.
As Americans rushed to surrender their constitutional rights, the peoples of the Middle East rose up from Libya to Iraq to demand those very rights for themselves– freedom of speech, religion, the press, and assembly, as well as safeguards against a secret police state that engages in routine unreasonable search and seizure and imposes cruel and unusual punishments while keeping prisoners hidden, denied habeas corpus, and often denied a speedy civil trial or even a trial at all.
(Source: thepolitics)
A little while ago, in the context of the shooting of Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, I mentioned on this blog that within the American political spectrum there are extremists on the right and the left, but the vitriolic, hyperbolic, violent rhetoric we hear today’s political speech mostly comes from the right.
The list below serves as a reminder of actual acts of violence — not just words, but the brandishing of sticks and stones — which have been committed by right-wing extremists in recent years. I still would not suggest that there’s a direct causal link between violent rhetoric and violent action, though.
A Recent History of Violent Right-Wing Extremism
July 27, 2008
Unemployed truck driver Jim David Adkisson opens fire on the congregation of a Unitarian Church in Knoxville, Tennessee, killing two people and seriously wounding six.
Read the whole list here on Alternet
This series has been about some of the difficulties I’ve faced since moving to Syria — the practical difficulties, the day-to-day things, the things I might have been vaguely concerned about but couldn’t have really predicted. The main theme has been problems originating not from Syria, but from the other side, the United States. In the last post, I mentioned how everything was looking good on the banking front. But this week something happened that made me so furious that I could barely process its implications at the time. At this moment, as of 3 hours ago to be exact, I’m in a position where I feel comfortable sharing what happened.

To sum up, I opened a Syrian bank account so that I’d have ready access to cash for university fees, rent and board, and other day-to-day expenses. At first, Barclays refused to transfer money from the UK to Syria, saying such transfers are rejected by their “sanctions department” and would not be permitted. I wrote before:
because Barclays has a branch in New York City, the bank falls under the jurisdiction of US laws and regulations, including the Patriot Act and the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
In the end, it took a lot more phone calls and emails before Barclays permitted the international transfer. I had to answer questions about the nature of the payment, whether or not these payments would be regular, etc.
But I finally got the money and have been living like normal so far in 2011.
That is, until a few days ago when a strongly worded letter was sent to me from Barclays stating, in no uncertain terms, that my account would be shut down for reasons they cannot reveal and that I’d be prohibited from doing business with Barclays ever again.
Not only does the letter fail to give a reason for closing my account, but it flatly states that they will never give a reason. It even advises to not even bother calling back for the reason, because the phone operators have been instructed to not share any further information. I am to withdraw all funds immediately and destroy my bank card.
It had been reported in the news that Barclays, as a result of being forced to pay millions of dollars worth of fines to the US Justice Department, had put in place policies and procedures designed to minimize the risk of the recurrence of violations of OFAC regulations. In my research, I couldn’t find any concrete details or examples of such policies and procedures; I suppose they’re confidential to folks outside the bank. But I think it’s fair to assume that I’ve stumbled upon one of these policies first-hand.
This really is ridiculous. What suspect profile must I have for this to have happened? I’ve been a really good Barclays customer since I joined them five years ago. In retrospect, opening an account with them was a big mistake. Had I been aware of the bank’s support for officially racist governments in Zimbabwe and apartheid South Africa, I might have taken a moral stance against Barclays and refused to open an account there. Besides the moral argument, the bank’s close links with US business and American banks was the thing that came back to bite me in the end.
The bigger question here is, of course, why all the sanctions against Syria? But this is for another time.
This time it is WooThemes. The reason is that the company which handles WooThemes’s payments, a third party called 2Checkout.com, does not like that I made a purchase while being physically located in Syria.
Here’s the message I just got from them:
Thank you for contacting 2Checkout.com. I apologize for any delays and would be happy to assist you with this issue. This order was canceled because of OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) sanctions against Syria and not because we believed the order to be fraudulent. Unfortunately we are unable to accept any order connected directly or indirectly to an OFAC sanctioned country as doing so could put our company at risk of being shut down. I apologize for any inconvenience that you may have experienced. Thank you once more for contacting 2Checkout.com and have a great day.
My response:
Thank you for your reply. I regret to hear that this was the reason why my account with the supplier was suspended, especially because I paid with a UK bank card and my permanent address is in the USA. How my currently being physically located in an OFAC sanctioned country would implicate you in any way is beyond my comprehension.
My use of the phrase “developing world” in a chart I made led to a reaction from someone on the internet who took offense to my use of this terminology. I admit that the term “developing world” should not be used to describe one large, monolithic area, and that I should have specified that my personal experience (that is, my inspiration for making the chart) is limited to the Middle East, specifically the country of Syria.
I understand that there’s no single definition of the terms developed country or developing country, nor any internationally established convention for the designation of countries as one or the other. On the other hand, Syria is by all practical definitions (UN, World Bank, IMF) a developing country. Euphemisms aside, if one accepts a definition that I just made up, that a “developing country” in one in which the tap water is full of hepatitis and amoebas and where fresh meat is not required by law to be kept refrigerated, then Syria most certainly is one. The fact is that the food preparation and storage hygiene standards here in Syria are woefully inadequate. Person on the internet replied:
I’m aware some health problems may happen when people who are used to a certain environment move to another. It happens the other way around, too. Or even when people from a “developed country” move to another “developed country”.
Listen, this is not about cultural stereotypes, ethnocentrism, or whatever else you’ve learned in your post-colonial studies textbooks. After moving from the USA to the UK, I occasionally suffered from summertime allergies that I never had before. I figured it was due to the different vegetation and such. But I never got violently ill from drinking British tap water, or from eating raw vegetables in restaurants, or from buying rotten meat! And I certainly didn’t need to boost up my vaccines before traveling there. Nobody needs to do. You know why? Because the drinking water in so-called “developed” countries is clean to drink. The meat in “developed” countries is refrigerated to prevent. Nuts in “developed” countries are kept refrigerated to prevent stomach cancer-causing fungus from appearing.
Person on the internet continues:
But my entire problem with your post comes from the use of the term “developing world” - which is itself highly questionnable - used as a collective term embracing completely different and particular societies that may have little in common except for the fact that they’re considered “poorer” than Europe and North America. Furthermore, its use in this context reinforces a colonialist construct that categorises non-white countries and people as dirty and unhealthy, thus affirming the need for segregation from white people. It implies also that Western hygiene and general standards are superior, whereas others are “inadequate”. One may ask to whom are they inadequate, since most people in Syria, in this case, don’t get sick very easily because of their food, anyway, surely not more than people in the “West”.
Congratulations, person on the internet, seems you have read a book! Reminds me of those tortured souls at SOAS, so woefully mired in personal identity crises, blind to plain facts that didn’t fit into their preset narratives of post-colonialism. Syria is poorer than Europe and North America and does have tap water unfit to drink. What’s dirty and unhealthy in Syria are the municipal water supply systems — not the people. I’m not trying to imply that Western drinking water standards are superior — I’m explicitly stating it. No euphemisms here.
The Syrian doctors and pharmacists we’ve visited in Damascus, Aleppo and Hama all agreed, asking flat out if we’d eaten in restaurants while in Syria, specifically dishes with uncooked vegetables or herbs like taboulleh. Doing so, they’ve said, is highly inadvisable. Syrians themselves get sick from improperly cleaned or stored foods. And just look at the relative lack of refrigeration here. Compare this to Lebanon, another “developing country” by the most commonly accepted definitions, where the tap water is drinkable. Lebanese shopkeepers we met even note the lack of public sanitation in Syria. It was a joke to them. An Algerian friend of ours who had been living in Damascus a few months before we arrived, was appalled by the situation here, warning us of the health issues that had befallen her, her partner, and colleagues of theirs.
Syrians don’t need to be segregated from anyone — they need cleaner water and better food storage standards. That’s all.
From Hama we took a 2 hour bus ride to Aleppo, costing a mere 150 SYP ($3) each. We arrived the day before Christmas Eve, and our first Aleppo experience was of a taxi driver trying to rip us off. But we showed him. I’ll explain.
He hurried us into his taxi just as we’d disembarked the bus. The ride had been, I repeat, 2 hours long, maybe a 100-mile journey. When I asked in Arabic how much the ride will cost, the man replied in English, “The meter.” Okay, that’s fine: that’s the most fair way, after all. And while we drove for a few minutes across Aleppo — less than 2 miles — the driver helpfully pointed out some of the well-known attractions. But once we arrived at the hotel, the driver demanded 300 SYP — and I blew up.
By now I’ve taken enough cabs in Syria to know that a metered ride of this length should cost no more than 50 SYP, and I’ve become confident enough with my own level of Arabic to stand up for myself when being cheated. I know that in the grand scheme of things, 300 SYP isn’t going to break the bank, and I understand and accept that, as a tourist in a developing country, you should give to the country more than you take. But this does not include getting cheated by men fully aware that you are visitors and fully expecting to get away with it. I’ve been cheated or shortchanged (intentionally or not) too often here in Syria, so this was to be the battled I’d pick to help break the trend, to make it known that cheating foreigners is not acceptable, to break the Syrian stereotype of tourists as people with loads of money to burn. At least that’s how I justified it to myself.
I made sure all our bags were out of the taxi and offered the man 100 SYP. Actually, before that I asked him in Arabic if 50 was okay. To that he scoffed — his jovial attitude underwent a sea change. His face and tone became angry and confrontational as he demanded 300. My jaw dropped. It was hard to believe that this was the same man who, less than 5 minutes ago, was kindly pointing out landmarks and popular attractions. I turned to Jennifer. “Unbelievable,” she said, before turning and walking towards the curb where a hotel employee had already started helping us with our bags.
I turned back to the man and told him to take the 100 SYP, but he wasn’t interested. I mean, he took the money from my hand but continued pressing for the full 300. I pointed out that the ride was 2km at most, that I have a map and know it should not cost so much. He didn’t care, and started yelling. He handed back the 100 SYP bill and threw his hands up in exasperation. Whatever, I thought, you’re not scaring me. In a diplomatic move, I pulled out a 50 SYP bill and told him to take the 150. He motioned again with his armed and refused. He pointed to the meter and yelled some things that I didn’t understand.
Surprisingly, the meter did indeed read 296 SYP, which is an impossible fare. At some point along the ride, I thought, he must have pushed the “ignorant tourist” button on the meter, thus automatically multiplying the actual fare by a factor of six. I said louder, “Tafaddil, tafaddil.” That is, “Take, take.” He realized I wasn’t backing down and began nervously spitting out all the English words he could think of: “ten… hundred…. money… kilometer…” — he pointed to a pair of traffic police at the other end of the street — “police… we go to police!” ”Tamaam,” I replied, yelling, “yalla!” (Fine, let’s go!)
Obviously he wasn’t actually going to bring this petty issue to the traffic police, who are not actual police and have no discernible authority other than their orange wand. This wasn’t their problem anyway. I yelled again, waving the 150 SYP in his face, “Tafaddil!” He finally snatched it and left the scene in a huff.
This small battle was (sort of) won.
Yesterday in Arizona a 22-yr-old kid shot and killed six people including a federal judge and a 9-yr-old girl; critically injured at least five others including Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords; in total 18 were injured besides the deceased. The gun used in the attack was bought legally.
Conservative media figures have a history of violent rhetoric, the past two years being no exception. Republican and so-called Tea Party activists and other politicians have joined this fray, in some cases calling for armed revolt if the Democrat-majority government does not change its ways. Certain individuals have been singled out, for example Glenn Beck suggesting Nancy Pelosi’s wine should be poisoned or Sarah Palin putting gun cross-hairs over a map of congresswoman Giffords’ and 19 others’ congressional districts or Fox News contributors suggesting that President Obama should be assassinated.
I suspect these pundits don’t actually want their political opponents to die and, to the contrary, are employing violent imagery as a rhetorical device to get people psyched up to participate in the political process. However, while it’s true that within our political spectrum there are extremists on the right and the left, you only get this sort of vitriolic hyperbole coming from the right.
It’s in this charged environment that an unstable person legally obtains a weapon and acts. Giffords narrowly escaped an assassination attempt; at present she’s recovering from brain surgery — the bullet went straight through her brain and out the other side of her head, having been fired from a distance of a few feet. The slain 9-yr-old girl, as it happens, was born on September 11, 2001, and was attending congresswoman Giffords’ meet-and-greet in order to learn more about how the American political process works. Unfortunately, she learned firsthand.
In this series I’ve been talking about how my home government is making life for me in Syria a lot more difficult and costly than it needs to be. First of all, they only allow the Washington, DC-based Embassy of Syria to issue visas to American citizens. Because I was living in the UK, this meant I had to express FedEx my passport at great cost and inconvenience — and as bad luck would have it, I missed a flight to Sweden because my passport was still en route on a delivery truck somewhere in far west London. And if that wasn’t enough, the Syrian Embassy charged a whopping US$131 for the service — more than 10x the price levied to other nationalities! Secondly, after arriving in Syria, the US Embassy here in Damascus continued to bleed time and money out of me, first, by compelling American citizens to use a convoluted online reservation system just for the right to enter the building, and, second, by charging US$50 for any and all routine notarial services — all while citizens of other countries just walk up to their embassies’ windows and get the forms done for free!
This post focuses again on the issue of money. In short: US law passed shortly after 9/11 — almost 10 years ago — has led to the freezing of my PayPal account and has prevented me from having ready access to all the savings I left over in my UK bank account before coming here to Syria. How can this be??
Comments